52 Comments
User's avatar
Dean Capinegro's avatar

Never sold it

Expand full comment
Take65's avatar

That’s a large position for me

Expand full comment
Gloria llana's avatar

Greg, why? The MMRI is still too high

Expand full comment
911Truther's avatar

Gregory, not too surprised you went bullish on a day when yields are once again rising on the 10YR with DXY less than 1% from it's 2YR high. So much for the MMRI. Buying into MMRI over 300? I don't know what to think of you, brother. I have to admit, you nailed it since before the Covid Crash. You're almost what I would describe as a permabull. Are you? I think so.

And why do you always lead your "lions" to Bitcoin? What is up with that?

Bitcoin is not money. It will never be money. When the Bitcoin pumpers recite their list of money characteristics (portability, divisibility, etc), they always leave out the one characteristic of money that Bitcoin doesn't have: stability. Without stability, you can't lend in it or denominate prices in it. If you can't lend in it or denominate prices in it, guess what? It ain't money.

The halving's ensure that Bitcoin will never be stable. The price of Bitcoin needs to double every 4 years or all the miners go broke. The only path to stability for Bitcoin is to abandon halvings, and instead of compensating miners with inflation of the Bitcoin supply, they would compensate them with 100% transaction fees.

RIOT burned 1,117 MWh in Q3 to earn one Bitcoin. A miner will facilitate 2,000 to 3,000 transactions to earn one block reward, which is 3.125 Bitcoin. And a transaction is a transaction, the same amount of work is used to facilitate a Bitcoin transaction of one Satoshi, one Bitcoin or 100 Bitcoin. The math is simple, a 4th grader could do it. The energy cost to facilitate one transaction is more than the typical US household uses per month. This, of course, ignores replacing all your processors every two years and all the other costs that go into any business.

If Bitcoin were to choose the only path to stability --- transaction fees --- the cost for a guy who dollar cost averages into Bitcoin every payday would be well north of $150 (and I'm being super conservative) just to buy a few Satoshis. He'd be effectively blocked from being a buyer. Without those buyers, the price would collapse.

I bet you don't reply to this. The truth hurts. You've been conned into a ponzi that is mathematically certain to go to zero. Bitcoin Bulls hate the truth, can't handle the truth, don't want the truth and avoid the truth at all costs.

Expand full comment
Kelly Ann Hirzel's avatar

I've been learning from / watching Gregory for over 3 years now and he has helped me tremendously. I'm sorry things haven't worked out for you but the ugliness in your post is unnecessary. If you don't like Gregory's teaching, try another channel. God Bless you.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 3Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
911Truther's avatar

"The halvings are specifically designed to incrementally limit BTC supply, until eventually, reaching the preordained fixed limit of BTC as decreed by its creator."

You do realize, there are 29 more halvings over the next 116 years, right? That puts Bitcoin at over $53 Billion per Bitcoin with a market cap of $1,127,428,915,200,000,000,000. Do you seriously think this is realistic? That is One sextillion, one hundred twenty-seven quintillion, four hundred twenty-eight quadrillion, nine hundred fifteen trillion, two hundred billion

"When the preordained amount of BTC has been achieved, there will be no further need, nor demand for BTC miners."

How do transactions get facilitated without the miners?

Just the fact that CNBC has been pumping the s#!t out of Bitcoin for over a decade while barely mentioning gold should be such a massive red flag to anyone capable of critical thought. Bitcoin is going to zero, it's a mathematical certainty. Get out now while you still can. It's a bubble, no different than Fart Coin. If you think for a second that Bitcoin will survive the impending Nasdaq crash, you are kidding yourself. Bitcoin is a Risk On trade. The correlation with Nasdaq with undeniable.

Expand full comment
Angry Tiger's avatar

I pulled everything but my commodities out

Expand full comment
trumpHELL666's avatar

Math Challenge:

U.S. Backed South Korea vs. China

https://x.com/gunsnrosesgirl3/status/1875138464070660379

Expand full comment
Randy Best's avatar

A sign of the times for sure.

Expand full comment
Austin Stringham's avatar

I buy JEPQ with my money market income every month.

Expand full comment
Ed K's avatar

Greg. If you’re expecting a meltdown in the bond market why are you taking on a high level of risk with this kind of investment?

Expand full comment
Gregory Mannarino's avatar

As I said, I will talk about why I did this during my livestream.

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

Can’t buy what you can afford but I just bought a few more shares of JEPQ in past few days

Expand full comment
dale's avatar

Nvidia expected to announce new gaming cards Jan 6. Potential day trade?

Expand full comment
Duke's avatar

I agree with a game-changing announcement.

Expand full comment
Steve Chandler's avatar

Good. Too big to fail JPMorgan. About as safe as it it gets these days

Expand full comment
Les Ranger's avatar

Why?

Expand full comment
P63happy@gmail.com's avatar

You must feel something I don’t feel. I still feel cautious.

Expand full comment
Grit's avatar

Thanks Gregory

Expand full comment
henery-da-8th's avatar

a link to jp web site prospectus and more, the investments etc. https://am.jpmorgan.com/JPMorgan/TVT/46654Q203/SP?site=JPMorganv3

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

20K...small position...?😁

Expand full comment