I got family members who think they will "retire" in two years and all their "wealth" is in the system. Told them you may want to diversify into something physical "just incase" and they told me I worry too much and that a digital currency will never happen and the system will never crash . Oh well you can only do so much to help people.
I don't beg on my knees much, but here goes. Please read this, It takes everything Greg has been reporting on economically, completely beyond any suggestion of his observations as opinion into provable, documented fact. This document is a manual that outlines the principles of economic manipulation being used now by the government which began under this method in 1954.
Manipulation of the economy is based on the laws of energy. The manual is based on a Harvard Study, conducted in 1948 to analyze the economic structure. It found that economics conforms specifically to the laws of electricity. Here is an excerpt.
"...it was discovered that an economy obeyed the same laws as electricity and that all of the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed for the electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics. This discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were and are kept a closely guarded secret, for example that in an economic model, human life is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when opening a switch connected to an active inductor is mathematically analogous to the initiation of war."
Economically then, debt is an energy inductor. It induces us as human energy to power the economic system with our own human input. That energy is weaponized, and targeted at various points in the economic structure. The social and economic reverberations are analyzed for effectiveness and the results are used to generate profit and social change, by systematically sending synchronized mathematically calculable signals, or shocks, through the system, at system targets monitoring results, updating, firing, and reanalyzing again, continuously.
So far verified by publishers one significant fact check in 2011. Authenticity is not refuted by anyone roving it to be other than a genuine government product. If you can, please do. It is called.....
Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars. An introductory programming manual. OPERATICS RESEARCH TECHNICAL MANUAL. TM-577905
If you know and can prove this to be pure crapola, get it out there. Let me know. Insult me for a fool if you want. If not, then it completely validates everything Greg is saying down to their inductance, capacitance, algebraic formulations, found in the manual. It states the economic science behind the tactics Greg reports on. Anyone with an understanding of basic electricity will understand it. It couples with Greg's work. If it is as valid as Greg's work, it has the necessary integrity to form a consciousness-penetrating, mass-awareness bullet, that can be fired in all directions.
I would donate $5 to you but I don’t use the vehicles you offer. If you added Zelle or debit card methods, you might increase the number of people contributing.
Fricken congress just passed a CR. As usual, McCarthy stabbed everyone in the back except the uniparty. He underhandedly promised the dems a separate Ukraine aid bill in exchange for their votes last night. The spending continues. Just when I thought I couldn't hate my country more.
You can download; Precedents, Instruments and Targets that the Fed Has Used to Create and Support a Postcrisis Global Safety Net Edward J Kane Working Paper No. 213 September 9th, 2023
Yes. I often cite a paper that was written by a New York Times reporter, Peter Goodman. It was released on, I believe, New Year’s Eve of 2017, meaning the end of 2017. And he wrote something, I think the title or subtitle was, Sweden Loves the Robots.
And I attended the Swedish gathering here in New York City, where he said, there is a tremendous danger to America. Because in Sweden, when somebody shows what robots can do, we’re all pretty happy. Because we’re all gonna have our children’s education and our healthcare and our pensions and adjustment assistance for retraining.
The possibilities are going up. And he said, now I have a question for you people from the United States. You used to always denigrate Europe saying it was sclerotic and the supply side flexibility of America made it the dynamo. He said, but with Donald Trump as president, are we really going to see a politics which facilitates and implements innovation that makes us all better off?
Because you could break down in our Swedish model with the transfers might continue to become more and more dynamic. And so in other words, facilitating change with assistance may be the new pathway. And as he said, with the digital, a change owned by one or two or a small group of people can have enormous impact on many, many people. And so…
I think this, what I’ll call adaptation dynamics, is a very important challenge for us to think about.
Alan Blinder (42:08.506)
I agree, absolutely. I mean, I’ve been there for a very long time, but it’s very, if you’re an American, that’s a very frustrating case to try to make in the political arena, because you have at least one party and probably more than one party pretty much adamantly against most anything you can put under that transfers umbrella. We do, you know, just pick it. Pick child care, income support, free education, free health care, daycare. You know, go right down the list. We do less than Sweden, and not just Sweden. It’s not like Sweden is the big outlier and they’re the only ones that do this. You got Sweden and the other Scandinavians and the Netherlands and Germany and so on. And we’re more the outlier among the rich countries. But, you know, it’s not easy to get Americans, let me rephrase the question, it’s next to impossible to get American body politic onto that side of the debate.
I say looking back on what happened, what we’ve learned, we’ve experienced a great deal of decline in the trust of governance and the trust of expertise according to all the surveys whether it’s Gallup or Richard Edelman who works with the World Economic Forum. And I think there are a lot of people. I know Martin Wolf who I’ve done a podcast with has written a book on the crisis of capitalist democracy and he is concerned about the temptation towards authoritarian alternatives and this mistrust, this fear, this sense that it’s not working for me is I think very dangerous. So I want to see what you think has happened, is happening. What have we learned? What have we not learned?
Thank you for the warning. No one else I subscribe to is paying attention. It is as if this did not exist. However it is utterly huge. A gorgeous day here - and yes, expecting a meltdown.
I got family members who think they will "retire" in two years and all their "wealth" is in the system. Told them you may want to diversify into something physical "just incase" and they told me I worry too much and that a digital currency will never happen and the system will never crash . Oh well you can only do so much to help people.
God people are stupid. Can't believe they still believe in the system.
They will be the first to ask for help.
Eff 'em.
Yes, its very hard to help some people. I go through this with my elderly mother quite a bit. I pretty much have to work at this every day.
Bring it!
Greg and Lions
I don't beg on my knees much, but here goes. Please read this, It takes everything Greg has been reporting on economically, completely beyond any suggestion of his observations as opinion into provable, documented fact. This document is a manual that outlines the principles of economic manipulation being used now by the government which began under this method in 1954.
Manipulation of the economy is based on the laws of energy. The manual is based on a Harvard Study, conducted in 1948 to analyze the economic structure. It found that economics conforms specifically to the laws of electricity. Here is an excerpt.
"...it was discovered that an economy obeyed the same laws as electricity and that all of the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed for the electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics. This discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were and are kept a closely guarded secret, for example that in an economic model, human life is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when opening a switch connected to an active inductor is mathematically analogous to the initiation of war."
Economically then, debt is an energy inductor. It induces us as human energy to power the economic system with our own human input. That energy is weaponized, and targeted at various points in the economic structure. The social and economic reverberations are analyzed for effectiveness and the results are used to generate profit and social change, by systematically sending synchronized mathematically calculable signals, or shocks, through the system, at system targets monitoring results, updating, firing, and reanalyzing again, continuously.
So far verified by publishers one significant fact check in 2011. Authenticity is not refuted by anyone roving it to be other than a genuine government product. If you can, please do. It is called.....
Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars. An introductory programming manual. OPERATICS RESEARCH TECHNICAL MANUAL. TM-577905
Full text, images, and links to two document PDFs are available here. https://iruur1325.substack.com/publish/post/137554894
Please read through it it is captivating.
If you know and can prove this to be pure crapola, get it out there. Let me know. Insult me for a fool if you want. If not, then it completely validates everything Greg is saying down to their inductance, capacitance, algebraic formulations, found in the manual. It states the economic science behind the tactics Greg reports on. Anyone with an understanding of basic electricity will understand it. It couples with Greg's work. If it is as valid as Greg's work, it has the necessary integrity to form a consciousness-penetrating, mass-awareness bullet, that can be fired in all directions.
Hi Greg,
I would donate $5 to you but I don’t use the vehicles you offer. If you added Zelle or debit card methods, you might increase the number of people contributing.
Fricken congress just passed a CR. As usual, McCarthy stabbed everyone in the back except the uniparty. He underhandedly promised the dems a separate Ukraine aid bill in exchange for their votes last night. The spending continues. Just when I thought I couldn't hate my country more.
Who did McCarthy appease? That’s who he is working for. For what it is worth, I contacted my congressman to get rid of him.
Yay! Glad you did. I did too, for whatever it's worth.
Greg what do u think of wht Nader is saying? https://rumble.com/v3lxix7-short-america-and-go-long-bric-countries-charles-nenner.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
Have a blessed Sunday Nik
woops thats Nenner LOL
Short America & Go Long BRIC Countries:
https://roy696.substack.com/p/short-america-and-go-long-bric-countries
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/creating-the-post-2008-global-safety-net-fed-precedents-instruments-and-targets
You can download; Precedents, Instruments and Targets that the Fed Has Used to Create and Support a Postcrisis Global Safety Net Edward J Kane Working Paper No. 213 September 9th, 2023
Mornin’ everyone.. gonna be an interesting week!
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/podcasts/looking-back-and-looking-ahead-15-years-after-the-lehman-collapse
Rob Johnson (40:09.975)
Yes. I often cite a paper that was written by a New York Times reporter, Peter Goodman. It was released on, I believe, New Year’s Eve of 2017, meaning the end of 2017. And he wrote something, I think the title or subtitle was, Sweden Loves the Robots.
And I attended the Swedish gathering here in New York City, where he said, there is a tremendous danger to America. Because in Sweden, when somebody shows what robots can do, we’re all pretty happy. Because we’re all gonna have our children’s education and our healthcare and our pensions and adjustment assistance for retraining.
The possibilities are going up. And he said, now I have a question for you people from the United States. You used to always denigrate Europe saying it was sclerotic and the supply side flexibility of America made it the dynamo. He said, but with Donald Trump as president, are we really going to see a politics which facilitates and implements innovation that makes us all better off?
Because you could break down in our Swedish model with the transfers might continue to become more and more dynamic. And so in other words, facilitating change with assistance may be the new pathway. And as he said, with the digital, a change owned by one or two or a small group of people can have enormous impact on many, many people. And so…
I think this, what I’ll call adaptation dynamics, is a very important challenge for us to think about.
Alan Blinder (42:08.506)
I agree, absolutely. I mean, I’ve been there for a very long time, but it’s very, if you’re an American, that’s a very frustrating case to try to make in the political arena, because you have at least one party and probably more than one party pretty much adamantly against most anything you can put under that transfers umbrella. We do, you know, just pick it. Pick child care, income support, free education, free health care, daycare. You know, go right down the list. We do less than Sweden, and not just Sweden. It’s not like Sweden is the big outlier and they’re the only ones that do this. You got Sweden and the other Scandinavians and the Netherlands and Germany and so on. And we’re more the outlier among the rich countries. But, you know, it’s not easy to get Americans, let me rephrase the question, it’s next to impossible to get American body politic onto that side of the debate.
...
I say looking back on what happened, what we’ve learned, we’ve experienced a great deal of decline in the trust of governance and the trust of expertise according to all the surveys whether it’s Gallup or Richard Edelman who works with the World Economic Forum. And I think there are a lot of people. I know Martin Wolf who I’ve done a podcast with has written a book on the crisis of capitalist democracy and he is concerned about the temptation towards authoritarian alternatives and this mistrust, this fear, this sense that it’s not working for me is I think very dangerous. So I want to see what you think has happened, is happening. What have we learned? What have we not learned?
Take it from there.
Well said GM...🌻
This week will be an eye opener hang on We are going down.
Thank you for the warning. No one else I subscribe to is paying attention. It is as if this did not exist. However it is utterly huge. A gorgeous day here - and yes, expecting a meltdown.
Good morning..
Happy Sunday Greg!